Longrich VS AIM Global... which do you think is more suited to today's economy and why?

[LEO10]

Network Marketing is known as the business of the 21st century... tell us which of these 2 giants in the industry is better suited for todays economy and your main reasons.

 

[Faith]

Both companies really have a very bad way getting people to join the company, that's they show others money and convenience them that they will make more than what they are seeing. But I think longrich is suitable because they produce for other companies.

 

[Driguez9]

Both companies really have a very bad way getting people to join the company, that's they show others money and convenience them that they will make more than what they are seeing. But I think longrich is suitable because they produce for other companies.

I think the issue with the strategies to recruit prospects is due to the doctrine most network marketers get. It's not really the fault of the companies.

 

[Driguez9]

On the subject of which I think is better suited to today's economy, I'd pick AIM because their compensation plan is simpler (far less complex), and their products are more health specific. However, I must say most global network marketing companies including these two over price their products making it extra tough for their affiliates and distributors to leverage sales.

 

[LEO10]

I'm glad some people see this as a healthy debate topic... because so many network marketers have been trained to quarrel with distributors of other network marketing companies instead of making their cases together in constructive ways to help many more people see the general benefits of the industry as well as the specific features that make each company stand out. More debates like these will help people understand each concept better and make more practical choices, expectations, and marketing plans when joining any of these companies.

My humble opinion.